| |
Below is a table showing the difference between the
CAC test and the STC test. As shown, the CAC test is
specifically designed for ceiling materials. The physical
set-up of the test is designed to standardize and approximate
the situation in most commercial building applications.
“Cross-talk” is a common problem in most
commercial buildings because typical interior walls
do not extend to the roof-deck. Noise is allowed to
flank over interior walls and be reflected down into
adjacent rooms. Ceiling tiles with high “CAC”
numbers are designed to stop noise from doing this.
The problem with most acoustical ceiling tiles is that
they try to be two things. The primary function of an
acoustical ceiling tile from an acoustic point of view
is to provide absorption in a space, thereby cutting
down on echo and reverberation. A secondary function
would be to stop noise from going from one room to another.
These are two distinctly different functions. Acoustically
absorptive materials are typically relatively light
and porous. Acoustic barriers are typically hard and
reflective, the exact opposite of a good absorber. Any
homogeneous material trying to function as both is invariably
going to be a compromise.
To achieve both good absorption numbers and high CAC
numbers, a composite is required. An absorptive material
with a backing of material designed to be an acoustic
barrier. Our typical AC-100B is a ceiling tile designed
to do both. Either a 1” thick (.85 NRC) or 2”
thick (1.15 NRC) layer of 6 lb./sq. ft. fiberglass laminated
to a 1/8” thick loaded vinyl noise barrier with
an STC rating of 26 by itself. Coupled with a 1”
layer of fiberglass it achieves an STC 29, or a 2”
layer STC 32. STC rating being a much more direct method
of measuring a material’s ability to stop noise
in a direct path. The CAC test is specific to room-to-room
transmission in a commercial setting. The AC-100B ceiling
tile is used as much for that as it is to solve an HVAC
noise problem, where noisy ductwork, VAV boxes, or other
types of air-handling units might be interfering in
an office setting. In those cases, a material’s
ability to stop noise in a straight line is most important.
A material that is easy to compare to ceiling tiles
is gypsum board. Often used in metal ceiling applications
to provide a higher STC, we know that a ½”
layer of drywall achieves an STC rating of 26, while
weighing in at approximately 1.8 lbs./sq. ft. Even ceiling
tiles with a high CAC number typically weigh significantly
less than that as shown below. While there is no direct
conversion figure between CAC and STC, we can draw some
conclusions using the weight per square foot and the
STC and CAC ratings we know. The typical High NRC/High
CAC panel weighs only 1.25 lbs./sq.ft., translating
to a much lower STC rating than the drywall, another
rigid, homogenous material. While we can’t assign
a specific CAC number to our AC-100B, we can see that
it will be significantly higher than the 40 exhibited
by the Typical High NRC/High CAC Tile, while offering
an NRC value of either .85 or 1.15.
| Product |
Weight (lbs./sq.ft.) |
STC Rating |
CAC Rating |
| AC-100B |
1.5 |
29 |
>40 |
| ½” drywall |
1.8 |
26 |
>40 |
Typical High CAC
Mineral Board Tile
|
1.25 |
<26 |
40 |
|